Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Sufentanil and Dexmedetomidine as Neuraxial Adjuvants in the Context of Cesarean Section Procedures

Authors

  • Dr. Mohammed M. M. Al-Doulaie M.B.Ch.B, C.A.B.A&IC Senior Specialist in Anesthesia & Interventional Pain Management, Al-Karama General Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Dr. Aseel Nabeel Ibrahim Altaie M. B. Ch. B - C.A.B.A&IC Senior specialist in Anesthesia. Alfalluja Teaching Hospital, Alfalluja. Iraq
  • Dr. Halah Mohammed Jawad K. Alkhattab M.B.Ch.B- C.A.B.A &IC senior Specialist in Anesthesia Al-Allamy Hospital For Specialized Surgery

Abstract

There's this technique called neuroaxial anesthesia, and it's typically the go-to choice for caesarean procedures. Now, why is that? Well, primarily because of its solid track record in delivering complete nerve blockage. It acts fast without causing a massive number hitches along the way. And to boost both potency and longevity of numbing effect all while swatting away side effects, doctors often pair it with various anaesthetic helpers—called intrathecal adjuvants if we're getting technical here.

However, as you will hear from this next section, it is crucial to understand that in our study, we examined the medical records of 62 patients who underwent C-sections while under some kind of anesthetic. We carefully examined how twenty-four patients responded to receiving dexmedetomidine [10 µg] and hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5% 10 mg) by imposing strict exclusion criteria. (group1). That's not all, though. Group 2 consisted of an additional twenty-eight patients who were treated with our regular protocol of hyperbaric buprevacaine (0.5% 10 mg) combined with sufentanil [5 µg]. The scale and detail of our look into this was comprehensive; we eagerly gauged motor and sensory block, measured pain after surgery period, noted down unwanted effects during the first day post-delivery — yeah, even newborn health wasn't left out. Updated Text: "Look, our research clearly showed that the group given sufentanil needed less pain relief. They were significantly better off compared to the dexmedetomidine bunch. You need to pay attention here, because those in group 1 suffered more after surgery! They rated their discomfort using VAS and scored an average of (4 ± 2), while folks in group 2 felt better and only averaged scores around (2 ± 1)—a substantial difference with a p-value <0.01.

But wait, before you jump into conclusions, keep this mind too—there weren't notable differences when it came down to factors like intensity of motor and sensory block or the time it took for motor functions return between these two groups! Oh and yes let's not forget about neonatal Apgar scores — no real contrast there either. However, cases of intense itching and the chilling shakes were experienced exclusively by Group 2 while, fascinatingly enough, those doped-up on dexmedetomidine reported zero episodes of midnight itches or shivers. So what's our gist here? Sufentanil might be crowned superior when we're chatting about post-operation pain relief but hold up! It does come with a mini ensemble of side-effects. On balance though, adding dexmedetomidine to your regimen induces no intraoperative jitters and jerks – not a single one!

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

M. Al-Doulaie, D. M. M., Ibrahim Altaie, D. A. N., & Jawad K. Alkhattab, D. H. M. (2023). Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Sufentanil and Dexmedetomidine as Neuraxial Adjuvants in the Context of Cesarean Section Procedures. World of Science: Journal on Modern Research Methodologies, 2(12), 186–196. Retrieved from https://univerpubl.com/index.php/woscience/article/view/3036